Irrelevant Forum

Go Back   Irrelevant Forum > Entertainment > Celebrities

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2009, 06:54 AM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 95
Send a message via AIM to Anthony Send a message via MSN to Anthony Send a message via Yahoo to Anthony Send a message via Skype™ to Anthony
Default Maxim's 2008 Hot 100 is Rigged

Maybe it's just me but I truly think that Maxim's Hot 100 is rigged. Does anyone really believe that Sarah Michelle Gellar made it to the #5 spot? And how about their number 1 pick for 2008, Marisa Miller? Ok ok she's hot but there's way hotter.

I personally think Jessica Alba should have been on the top 10 but instead she was 34! Same goes with Mila Kunis who's number 81 on their list. Are they freaking blind? Just take a look!



That's a lot of yum yum mixed with a whole lot of god dayum!

You can check out the whole list of Maxim's 2008 Hot 100 for your self and see if you agree with any of their choices.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2009, 04:44 PM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 392
Default

I could't agree more. No way Jessica Alba gets beaten by Buffy.

Hillary Duff at #25?! (way too high)

Megan Fox at #16?! (way too low)
__________________
"Even though I'm no more than a monster - don't I, too, have the right to live?" -- Oldboy (2003)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2009, 01:16 AM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wylie, Texas
Posts: 90
Default

And just look at some of the women they left off the list:

Jennifer Tilly
Laura San Giacomo
Janeane Garofalo
Salma Hayek
Mimi Rogers
Jenny McCarthy
Elizabeth Mitchell
Petra Verkaik
Danni Ashe

It's a disgracefully incomplete list. The only rating I sorta agree with is Scarlet Johanssen.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2009, 09:05 AM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy View Post
And just look at some of the women they left off the list:

Jennifer Tilly
Laura San Giacomo
Janeane Garofalo
Salma Hayek
Mimi Rogers
Jenny McCarthy
Elizabeth Mitchell
Petra Verkaik
Danni Ashe

It's a disgracefully incomplete list. The only rating I sorta agree with is Scarlet Johanssen.
Janeane Garofalo?! WTF!?
__________________
"Even though I'm no more than a monster - don't I, too, have the right to live?" -- Oldboy (2003)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2009, 03:22 PM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 95
Send a message via AIM to Anthony Send a message via MSN to Anthony Send a message via Yahoo to Anthony Send a message via Skype™ to Anthony
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldboy View Post
Janeane Garofalo?! WTF!?
I'd bone her short weird ass. But I don't know that she belongs on the list.. maybe as #99.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2009, 04:10 PM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 392
Default

This only ranked as #16?! Please!




By the way, Randy, I think Mimi Rogers may officially be a little long in the tooth to be included on the 100 Sexiest Women list (unless you're talking about the Top 100 Sexiest Women Over 50). But that's just me.

__________________
"Even though I'm no more than a monster - don't I, too, have the right to live?" -- Oldboy (2003)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2009, 04:12 PM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wylie, Texas
Posts: 90
Default

I think any photo can be less than flattering. Mimi Roger is hotter than half the women on that Maxim list, frankly. I've never even heard of a lot of those women, in fact.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2009, 08:07 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Somewhere in Big America
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy View Post
I think any photo can be less than flattering. Mimi Roger is hotter than half the women on that Maxim list, frankly. I've never even heard of a lot of those women, in fact.
I think there's some miscommunication here. Randy's talking about the Top 100 list from 1994.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2009, 08:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 211
Default

Holy Crap isn't Emma Watson a little young to be number 94?

I know I am a woman, but is Angelina Jolie out of the running completely now?

hell I could look good with a little Glamour Shot Photography with lots of airbrushing, too!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2009, 02:14 AM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big America View Post
I think there's some miscommunication here. Randy's talking about the Top 100 list from 1994.

Oh, well that makes a lot more sense.
__________________
"Even though I'm no more than a monster - don't I, too, have the right to live?" -- Oldboy (2003)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0